• ABOUT DIME
  • SEARCH
  • RESOURCES
  • CALENDAR
  • CONTACT
  • NEWS AGGREGATOR

DIME

  • community
  • calls
  • working papers
  • working packages
  • jobs
  • publications
DIME » Working Papers » Intellectual Property Rights, working papers

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Search

Intellectual Property Rights, working papers

Proprietary and non-proprietary intellectual property marketplaces: Their functioning and efficiency as experienced by UK software firms

Submitted by Birgitte Andersen on 28 August, 2009 - 11:44.

Number: 
89
Author(s): 
Birgitte Andersen, University of London, Birkbeck College
Ainurul Rosli, University of London, Birkbeck College
Federica Rossi, University of Torino and University of London
Waraporn Yangsap, University of London, Birkbeck College

By exploring the patterns of engagement in several intellectual property (IP) marketplaces on the part of a sample of software firms based in the UK, the article attempts to shed light on the strategic reasons which induce firms to participate in different IP marketplaces and governance structures, often at the same time.  read more »

  • WP14
  • copyright
  • intellectual property
  • marketplaces
  • non-patent protection
  • Open Source
  • patents
  • software industry
  • strategic benefits
  • 1 attachment

Intellectual Property (IP) marketplaces and how they work: Evidence from German pharmaceutical firms

Submitted by Birgitte Andersen on 28 August, 2009 - 11:36.

Number: 
88
Author(s): 
Birgitte Andersen, University of London, Birkbeck College
Federica Rossi, University of Torino and University of London
Johannes Stephan, Technical University Freiberg

By exploring the patterns of engagement in several intellectual property (IP) marketplaces on the part of a sample of pharmaceutical firms based in Germany, the article attempts to shed light on the strategic reasons which induce firms to participate in different IP marketplaces and governance structures, often at the same time.  read more »

  • WP14
  • intellectual property
  • marketplaces
  • non-patent protection
  • Open Source
  • patents
  • pharmaceutical firms
  • strategic benefits
  • 1 attachment

The economics of knowledge and the governance of universities’ third stream activities

Submitted by Birgitte Andersen on 18 August, 2008 - 09:03.

Number: 
87
Author(s): 
Federica Rossi, Universita' degli studi di Torino(IT)

In the course of the last few decades, universities have been increasingly involved in third stream activities, which often result in increased interactions with firms aimed at the creation, dissemination and exploitation of knowledge.  read more »

  • WP14
  • economic of information
  • economics of science
  • knowledge governance
  • third stream activities
  • university-industry relationships
  • 1 attachment

IPR and “open creativity”: The cases of videogames and of the music industry

Submitted by Birgitte Andersen on 2 July, 2008 - 16:15.

Number: 
86
Author(s): 
Laurent Bach, BETA
Patrick Cohendet, BETA and HEC
Julien Pénin, BETA
Laurent Simon, HEC(CANADA)
  • WP14
  • 1 attachment

User Communities and Hybrid Innovation Processes. Theoretical Foundations and Implications for Policy and Research

Submitted by Birgitte Andersen on 27 June, 2008 - 10:54.

Number: 
85
Author(s): 
Dietmar Harhoff, University of Munich and CEPR
Philip Mayrhofer, University of Munich and CDTM

Based on the notion of heterogeneity and skill differentiation among users, we develop a typology of interactions between user communities and firms producing a product or service around which the community is centered. Hybrid innovation models are described as stable arrangements in which part of the innovation function is relegated to the user community, but the commercially oriented firm is capable of systematically and repeatedly appropriating monetary returns to the community-generated innovations.  read more »

  • WP14
  • 1 attachment

Emerging coordination mechanisms for multiparty IPR holders: linking research with standardization

Submitted by Birgitte Andersen on 27 June, 2008 - 10:49.

Number: 
84
Author(s): 
Eric J. Iversen, Nifu Step Norway and the Australian Innovation Research Centre
Rudi Bekkers, Dialogic inovaatie & interactie and ECIS (NL)
Knut Blind, Berlin University of Technology and Fraunhofer Institute for systems and innovation research Karlsruhe
The standards setting process relies to an increasing degree on successfully integrating up-to-date research and development results. Successful interaction between research and standards can promote further innovation activity and provide important social benefits in general.  read more »
  • WP14
  • 1 attachment

Ideas for rent: an overview of markets for technology

Submitted by Birgitte Andersen on 12 June, 2008 - 13:55.

Number: 
83
Author(s): 
Ashish Arora, Heinz School Carnegie Mellon University
Alfonso Gambardella, Bocconi University Milan
  • WP14
  • 1 attachment

The impact of music downloads and P2P filesharing on the purchase of music in Canada

Submitted by Birgitte Andersen on 4 June, 2008 - 07:42.

Number: 
82
Author(s): 
Birgitte Andersen, Birkbeck University of London
Marion Frenz, British Institute of Technology and Ecommerce(BITE)

This study measures the extent to which free music downloads, including the use of P2P file sharing networks, act as substitutes or complements to music purchase in markets for CDs and electronic delivered music (such as MP3).  read more »

  • WP14
  • 1 attachment

New Moves in 'Legal Jujitsu' to combat the Anticommons.

Submitted by Birgitte Andersen on 4 June, 2008 - 07:39.

Number: 
81
Author(s): 
Paul A. David, Stanford University and l'Ecole Polytechnique & Telecom-ParisTech

Full title : New Moves in 'Legal Jujitsu' to combat the Anticommons.
Mitigating IPR constraints on innovation thru a 'bottom-up' approach to systemic institutional reform
.  read more »

  • WP14
  • 1 attachment

Intellectual property rights and 'open innovation' in services

Submitted by Birgitte Andersen on 4 June, 2008 - 07:36.

Number: 
80
Author(s): 
Birgitte Andersen, Birkbeck University of London

In this paper it is argued that the evolution towards using the IPR system in support of ‘open innovation’ processes in services, based upon sharing information, knowledge, ideas and (cultural) expressions, has been led by firms and industry in their strategic interactive or collaborative IP management, rather than led by government policy designing the law and enforcement.  read more »

  • WP14
  • Intellectual property rights
  • Open innovation
  • proprietary and non-proprietary
  • services
  • strategy and policy
  • 1 attachment
123456789next ›last »
  • community
  • calls
  • working papers
  • working packages
  • jobs
  • publications