• ABOUT DIME
  • SEARCH
  • RESOURCES
  • CALENDAR
  • CONTACT
  • NEWS AGGREGATOR

DIME

  • community
  • calls
  • working papers
  • working packages
  • jobs
  • publications
DIME » Working Papers » Wp14 » Mapping closed and open innovation practices: a comparison across nine countries based on micro-level innovation survey data

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Mapping closed and open innovation practices: a comparison across nine countries based on micro-level innovation survey data

Submitted by Birgitte Andersen on 9 May, 2008 - 12:51.

Number: 
64
Author(s): 
Marion Frenz
Ray Lambert
This paper sets about identifying different and complex innovation practices across nine countries by exploring data from firm level innovation surveys conducted in nine countries: Austria, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, France, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea and the United Kingdom. Our results suggest that innovating firms in these countries adopt one or more of the following innovation modes: (i) ‘new-to-market innovating’, (ii) ‘marketing based imitating’, (iii) ‘process modernising’, (iv) ‘wider innovating’. The extent to which IPRs, external technology, design or marketing activities play a role in these innovation practices, varies considerably across countries. For example, in Austria, Denmark and New Zealand diffused technology (externally acquired R&D) is used together with own technology in bringing about novel products, suggesting a more open innovation pattern. In contrast among firms in France, New Zealand and the UK we identify a greater reliance on IPRs (e.g. patents, copyrights and design registrations) while at the same time omitting externally acquired technologies. The latter may suggest perhaps a more closed approach to innovation among one set of firms.
Filename/TitleSize
WP64-IPR-up.pdf236.44 KB
  • WP14
  • community
  • calls
  • working papers
  • working packages
  • jobs
  • publications